Yet Another BBS Company Blames Humans! No Kidding!

“The BST study (in which Exxon, Potash Corp, Shell, BHP, Billington, Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland and Maersk participated) offers reasoned logic for a new paradigm of injury prevention and interventions.” Wayne Pardy

I met and worked with Dan Petersen in 1984…he had a very particular view of traditional safety management assumptions and conclusion reached based on very bad science. I saw him in the Royal York hotel in Toronto tell a room full of Ontario “5 Star audit affected” safety folks that there was NO scientific correlation with passing a safety audit and getting safety results. I thought I was going to have to do CPR are several of the audience members. They were all filled with “opinion” with absolutely NO real data.

The problem continues.  Having Behaviour Based Safety companies to do research on their own clients is like asking McD cooks who makes the best hamburgers. What do you think they are going to say? Once you’ve had a drink from the BBS kool-aid you start believing the BBS mantra…”Human’s cause incidents”. Of course they do, but name 10 incidents that you can discuss in detail that “didn’t” have an unsafe condition attached…well according to the “data” (all opinion based by the way) 9.6 of them we can only blame on humans….poppycock I say! Dan just rolled over a bit. I really miss him!

Thinking About Appearance-Based Safety©

Today on a conference call with some good friends and colleges the discussion evolved to where we were talking about corporations becoming dis-satisfied with their current state of their “safety culture”. The ones that are good, just not GREAT, at safety management. I said that I saw these companies as being where it looked like they were safe (intention binders in place, passing audits, managing low injuries numbers through claims management) but it just appeared that way. I thought these companies were achieving “Appearance-Based Safety”.
I liked it so much I copyrighted the term. There’s probably a book in there somewhere…Working title…”Beyond Appearance-Based Safety©”

Creating Safety Excellence

Creating Safety Excellence is very much about what we do on a daily basis to create safety environments and behaviours. How we manage the risk we face and how we manage our behaviours which will enhance our safe production of the services and products of your jobs is all important to our safety results. We’re interested in hearing about “Safety Creating” activities that you’ve experienced and implemented. Feel free to comment on the blog or send us an email to aquilley@safeytyresults.ca.

Hope to hear from you soon!

Safety rules flouted on construction sites: critics CBC News – Alberta

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2011/08/23/edmonton-construction-safety-marques.html?ref=rss

Do more safety inspections really work? Can the strategy of “the few controlling the many” get results? Logically how many inspectors would you need to accomplish this goal? How well is it working in other areas of “safety”. Thank goodness for all that “traffic” enforcement. It’s basically eliminated speeding now hasn’t it?

The strategy of more is better simply doesn’t get the results we’re hoping for. Never has never will. There are better ways.

http://ezinearticles.com/?Safety-Management-Series—Effective-and-Efficient-OHS-Management&id=6493478

Observing what the conditions and behaviours are in your work process are essential to creating safety. The Edwards Deming quote comes to mind: “If you can’t describe what you are doing as a process, you don’t know what you’re doing.” Nothing better than a fresh set of eyes to see the situation.

That being said, what is the real value of “blitz” inpections from enforcers? Does it really have a significant effect on the long term health and safety of people in the jurisdition?

Enforcement and measurement that is unpredictible doesn’t really fit the model of human behaviour that we all know works. Consequences that are random have little effect on behaviour because we simply don’t think it will happen. Why would we?

Incident Imaging – Let’s Imagine!

Adapted from “Creating & Maintaining a Practical Based Safety Culture”

http://www.safetyresults.ca/safety_book.html

OH&S experts struggle with establishing the essential measurements of what makes a workplace healthy and safe and yet there’s been a lot written in recent years about leading indicators of safety. Although the components of what makes a great safety culture will continue to be refined and re-established as more evidence comes to light, one fact seems to be evident without many apposing views. Safety requires a high level of worker involvement. For many years we’ve known from Dr. Dan Petersen’s Six Criteria for Safety Excellence that you simply can’t have a safety excellent culture without employees being involved. Bottom line is that engaging your employees in safety activities is essential to creating a culture which results in truly getting safety results.

So let’s explore a technique we can use to encourage and engage our workers in establishing a richer safety culture.

Let’s Imagine

We’ve all done it as kids-let’s imagine. This technique is a wonderful way to learn from your workers what they think the safety problems and solutions are in an engaging and often fun way.

It starts simply enough. Ask your employees, “What would be the worst incident that we could have here?” Or you could ask “What things do we do in our work here that could cause us to get hurt?” Then stand back and listen. It’s important to remind everyone not to use anyone’s name if they start to discuss real situations. If you empower your employees in a non-threatening atmosphere to talk about what “could” happen, you will open the door for them to tell you about all the incidents that they’ve experienced and didn’t take the time to report it, like perhaps they should have. In this forum of “let’s imagine” they can give details of what has happened or nearly happened without the fear of embarrassment. For example, I could tell you that I wasn’t paying attention as I walked backwards, almost falling into the inspection pit. But this really happened to a cousin of mine…never to me (wink).

Truly Proactive

Many of the activities we involve ourselves in are labeled as proactive, but we’re really just using our experience to anticipate what might happen in the future.
Incident Imagining does exactly that. We use our knowledge about what we do at work and project what could happen. The real beauty of this approach is that it gives you an opportunity to uncover things that have happened in a non-threatening environment. Imagine a group of your employees discussing
possible incidents. During the brainstorming session it’s very possible and highly likely that some of your employees will start to feel comfortable about
telling the group about things that have actually happen, but framing it in an “it could happen” situation.

The beauty of this approach is it stimulates worker groups to use their imagination to think through what they do on a daily basis and what could happen if they don’t control the hazards associated with their assigned tasks.

Incident Imaging Process

1. With small groups of employees working in teams, give them an assignment to list the incidents that could happen doing one of their regular tasks. For example, if you have a group of workers who regularly install water pipes in trenches they would no doubt list something like:

  • Fall into trench.
  • Muscle strains – over lifting.
  • Trench collapse.
  • Hit by machinery.
  • Trip on uneven ground.
  • Traffic enters work area.
  • Hit by pipe being unloaded.
  • Extreme temperatures.
  • Underground utility strike.

The rules of brainstorming apply here. We don’t evaluate the suggestions; we just let the employees list them.

2. Once the issues are listed then each one is analyzed by asking the worker group how those situations could be created. What conditions would have to be in place to let some be injured by each of the listed incidents? For example:

  • Trench collapse – What conditions would have to be in place for this to actually happen?
  • No cutback.
  • We don’t use the trench cage (box).
  • We don’t install shoring.
  • We enter an unprotected trench/excavation.
  • We’re in a rush so someone just jumps down for a second to retrieve a tool.

3. The next step is to talk about and list how we can prevent these situations from happening.

Here’s Problem Solving 101. List the ideas your people have on how to prevent the situations from developing. You’ll find the underlying causes that need to be addressed. Some people call these root causes. Personally I try to avoid rating causes by titles and just list all the causes that people think may create the situation.

For example:

  • Shoring materials may not be readily available, creating a delay, therefore creating a “rush” situation.
  • We could forget our tools in the bottom of the trench after the shoring has been removed.
  • Location of the pipe installation is too close to underground utilities to properly cutback the sides of the trench.

4. Develop solutions.

Here comes the fun part. We simply come up with solutions to these imagined causes. I think it will become pretty apparent that both real and imagined problems will come to light and the discussion will turn from problem identifying to problem solving.

For example:

  • Change the minimum inventory numbers of shoring materials held in the storage yard.
  • Create a quick inspection checklist before the shoring is removed.
  • Hold pre-job meetings to remind everyone that entering the excavation before shoring is installed and after it is removed should not be done for any reason.

5. Assign the solutions and hold people positively accountable to get them done.

There’s nothing worse than going to a meeting or session where solutions are discussed and created and then they never get done. It is essential that the solutions that are resolved in your incident imaging exercise be assigned to someone, then followed up to ensure that the solutions are implemented. Saying “someone should do something about this!” without assigning the “someone” to the task is almost certainly making it clear than no one will do anything about it.

So what are you waiting for? Start today. At your next safety meeting try it out. You will find that groups of your staff working on real issues will engage one another in safety.